Gait training
At least one paper behind this review states what this option was measured against. That is not a ranking, and this option carries no evidence profile of its own.
- reactive / perturbationNeuromotor · 1 paper put it here (inferred by the extraction, not stated in the paper)
- dynamic balanceNeuromotor · 1 paper put it here
- gait and steppingNeuromotor · 2 papers put it here
- Exercise: Walking on a 7-m walkway with embedded sliding device to simulate slips. - Stance or foot position: Normal walking stance; slips induced by platform release underfoot. - Support surface: 7-m walkway with movable platforms. - Use of hand support: Not mentioned. - Eyes open or closed: Not mentioned. - Head movement: Not mentioned. - Progression sequence: Normal walking followed by unannounced slips; subjects instructed to recover balance. - Repetitions or hold times: 8 unannounced slips per subject.
AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF FALLS IN GAIT-SLIP: A HARNESS LOAD CELL BASED CRITERIONWalking on circular routes, straight lines, and obstacle negotiation tasks with or without support.
Dual-task training in older adults: The effect of additional motor tasks on mobility performance.Incorporates dance steps, circling, figure eights, directional changes, obstacle courses, and dual-task training.
Evidence-Based Exercise Prescription for Balance and Falls Prevention: A Current Review of the Literature
Nothing states what this option's dose measures — no library step prescribes this option and its review states no dose unit.
- Dose: 8 unannounced slips per session - Time: Not mentioned (no information on minutes per session, sessions per week, total weekly hours, or total programme length)
AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF FALLS IN GAIT-SLIP: A HARNESS LOAD CELL BASED CRITERION
Equipment is a property of the movement and is authored, never derived from the evidence corpus (docs/research/round2/ROUND2_KNOWN_CORRECTIONS.md §1). This option resolves to no catalogue exercise, so nothing has authored it yet.
ability to walk independently, supervision
AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF FALLS IN GAIT-SLIP: A HARNESS LOAD CELL BASED CRITERION
The exercise involves unannounced slips on a 7-m walkway with a sliding device, simulating real-life slip scenarios. The progression or regression is not explicitly mentioned in terms of traditional balance exercises, but the unannounced nature of the slips challenges participants to react quickly.
AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF FALLS IN GAIT-SLIP: A HARNESS LOAD CELL BASED CRITERION
- Safety: A harness system is used to ensure participant safety during perturbation training. - Contraindications: Not explicitly mentioned, but the study implies that individuals should not participate unsupervised due to the need for proper harness adjustment and safety monitoring. - Supervision requirements: Supervision is necessary to ensure proper adjustment and use of the harness system.
AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF FALLS IN GAIT-SLIP: A HARNESS LOAD CELL BASED CRITERION
Facility or specialist (harness, sliding device on a walkway)
AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF FALLS IN GAIT-SLIP: A HARNESS LOAD CELL BASED CRITERIONMinimal or home (stepping targets), can be done in various settings.
Evidence-Based Exercise Prescription for Balance and Falls Prevention: A Current Review of the Literature
- Tai Chi — a paper measured this option against it“Tai Chi was compared against control and found to reduce falls” · Emily C. McLaughlin, Rasha El-Kotob, J. Chaput et al. (2020) · 10.1139/apnm-2020-0279
- Proprioceptive training — a paper measured this option against it“Sensorimotor exercises compared against proprioceptive exercises” · Silvo Pšeničnik Sluga, Ž. Kozinc (2024) · 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12010
- Dual-task training — a paper measured this option against it“and a dual-task (DT) training group” · P. R. Brustio, Emanuela Rabaglietti, Sabrina Formica, M. E. Liubicich (2018) · 10.1016/j.archger.2017.12.003
- Tandem stance / walking — a paper measured this option against it
A paper measuring one option against another does not make the two interchangeable, and it does not say which to choose. These are listed as what the papers did, and nothing here proposes a substitution.