Follow a DASH-Style Plan
Load up on vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and low-fat dairy while trimming added salt. DASH stands for Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; the pattern was designed for blood pressure.
Diagnosed hypertension or kidney disease needs clinician oversight
- Signs of disordered eating (food/weight preoccupation, restriction, bingeing, purging, compulsive exercise): see a qualified eating-disorder professional
- Diagnosed medical condition (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, GI disease): see a registered dietitian or physician
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding: see a prenatal provider or registered dietitian
- Unintentional weight loss, difficulty swallowing, or persistent GI symptoms: seek medical evaluation
- Hypertension, kidney disease, or potassium-affecting medication: see a clinician/dietitian
How to do it
What the evidence says
This practice is one way to carry out what the sources on the concept entry (phys.nutrition.dash-eating-pattern) studied: the DASH pattern and blood pressure. Filippou 2020 (meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials) reports that DASH reduced systolic blood pressure by 3.2 mmHg and diastolic by 2.5 mmHg compared with control in adults with and without hypertension; Saneei 2014 (meta-analysis of 17 randomised trials) reports reductions of 6.74 and 3.54 mmHg, greater with energy restriction and in hypertensive subjects; Bensaaud 2025 (Cochrane review of 5 randomised trials) reports no clear differences in myocardial infarction, stroke or all-cause mortality against comparators, with low to very low certainty. It is an eating pattern for general adults, not a treatment; it complements and does not replace medical care. The full account, source by source, is on the concept entry this practice links to (phys.nutrition.dash-eating-pattern).
- 'DASH is medicine-free BP control for everyone.' It complements, not replaces, medical care.
- 'Only table salt counts.' Count sodium from packaged and prepared foods too.
- 'You must go salt-free.' Moderation, not elimination, is the goal.
- Do not claim any food, diet, or supplement cures, treats, or prevents any disease
- Do not diagnose nutrient deficiencies or medical conditions
- Do not promise specific weight-loss amounts or timelines
- Do not deliver individualized medical nutrition therapy or replace clinical care
- Agreement
- Direction recorded for 0 of 9 sources; not yet recorded for the rest.
- The claim's outcome
- Outcome not yet recorded
- Certainty
- No source states a certainty rating.
- Authors
- Sources share authors: L. Azadbakht (senior author of 2 sources).
- How the sources were read
- Some sources are based on abstracts, not full texts.
What each source measured and concluded (9)
- What it measured
- Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Studies and participants, as stated
- 30 RCTs, n=5545 participants
- What it measured
- Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N=2,561 across 17 RCTs (20 comparisons)
- What it measured
- Lipid profile (triglycerides, LDL, total cholesterol, HDL)
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical controlled trials
- Studies and participants, as stated
- 17 studies, 2218 individuals
- What it measured
- Serum inflammatory marker (hs-CRP)
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Studies and participants, as stated
- 7 trials eligible; 6 studies with 451 participants in meta-analysis
- What it measured
- Incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in prospective cohort studies; systolic blood pressure (SBP) in controlled trials.
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- Umbrella review of 7 systematic reviews and meta-analyses (3 of prospective cohort studies and 4 of controlled trials)
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N=942,140 participants across 15 studies (prospective cohort studies); N=4,414 participants across 31 studies (controlled trials)
- What it measured
- Cancer mortality by dietary quality indices
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
- Studies and participants, as stated
- 27 publications
- What it measured
- Risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by DASH diet adherence
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Studies and participants, as stated
- 7 studies in review, 6 in meta-analysis; 568,213 participants including 16,694 CKD cases
- What it measured
- Risk of metabolic syndrome (incidence, prevalence, development)
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review (8 observational studies and 4 clinical trials)
- Studies and participants, as stated
- 12 eligible studies
- What it measured
- Myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke
- How it was read
- based on the abstract, not the full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review of RCTs (Cochrane, GRADE)
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N=1397 participants across 5 RCTs (1075 in meta-analyses)
Every source below is shown with its study design and links to the original study. This is the audit trail.
“Abstract only” means the review read that paper’s abstract, not its full text; “screened only” means it was included at re-screening and not extracted. Both stay in the trail with their DOI, because how a source was read is part of the audit.