Dynamic Warm-Up Sequence
Five to ten minutes of dynamic drills before activity: one way to carry out what the sources on the concept entry studied, dynamic and static stretching before explosive performance. Their conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect.
Control range early; do not force cold end-range.
- Sharp or radiating pain during stretching, stop and consult a clinician.
- Sudden loss of range of motion or joint instability, seek a physical therapist.
- Numbness, tingling, or a recent injury, get medical clearance first.
How to do it
What the evidence says
This practice is one way to carry out what the sources on the concept entry (phys.flexibility.static-vs-dynamic) studied: dynamic stretching and static stretching in a warm-up, with explosive performance such as sprint and jump as the outcomes. Those sources are three systematic reviews (Behm 2016, Yamaguchi 2014 with 137 studies, Opplert 2018), a meta-analysis of 35 studies (Li 2023), and randomised and non-randomised trials. Their conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect of a dynamic warm-up on performance and no comparison with static stretching. The full account, source by source, is on the concept entry this practice links to (phys.flexibility.static-vs-dynamic).
- Static stretching is a better warm-up, dynamic protects performance.
- Warming up guarantees you cannot get injured.
- This replaces sport-specific skill practice.
- Agreement
- Direction recorded for 0 of 11 sources; not yet recorded for the rest.
- The claim's outcome
- Outcome not yet recorded
- Certainty
- No source states a certainty rating.
What each source measured and concluded (11)
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = not reported participants across 137 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review and meta-analysis
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = [not reported] participants across 35 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
Every source below is shown with its study design and links to the original study. This is the audit trail.