Static Versus Dynamic Stretching Before Explosive Performance: What the Sources Studied
Reviews and trials of dynamic and static stretching in a warm-up, with power, sprint and jump performance as the outcomes, on their own and inside a full task-specific warm-up. The sources' conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect and no comparison.
None, informational content.
- Persistent joint pain or sudden loss of range of motion, refer to a physician or physical therapist.
What the evidence says
The sources on this entry studied dynamic stretching and static stretching in a warm-up, with explosive performance such as sprint and jump as the outcomes. Three are systematic reviews: Behm 2016 on acute stretching, Opplert 2018 on dynamic stretching, flexibility and performance, and Yamaguchi 2014 (137 studies) on dynamic-stretching protocols for explosive performance. Li 2023 is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 studies. Six are primary trials: Winchester 2008 (non-randomised) and Bishop 2013 (randomised) on static stretching and sprint performance, Aouadi 2025 (randomised) on repeated sprints in elite players, Blazevich 2018 (randomised) on stretching within a full dynamic warm-up, Stuart 2017 (randomised) on warm-up duration and vertical jump, and Taylor 2009 (non-randomised) on static stretching followed by a sport-specific warm-up. The sources' conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect of either stretching type on performance and no comparison between them, alone or inside a full warm-up.
- Dynamic stretching builds more flexibility than static, what this finding supports is that dynamic stretching preserves explosive performance where prolonged static stretching tends to impair it.
- Static stretching is always bad, the penalty attributed to prolonged static stretching is an acute one on explosive output that follows it.
- Dynamic stretching protects against injury where static does not.
- Agreement
- Direction recorded for 0 of 10 sources; not yet recorded for the rest.
- The claim's outcome
- Outcome not yet recorded
- Certainty
- No source states a certainty rating.
What each source measured and concluded (10)
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = not reported participants across 137 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review and meta-analysis
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = [not reported] participants across 35 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
Every source below is shown with its study design and links to the original study. This is the audit trail.