Static Stretching and Range of Motion: What the Reviews Measured
Meta-analyses, systematic reviews and trials of static stretching and joint range of motion, in single sessions and over weeks, across hamstrings, ankle dorsiflexion and other muscle groups. The sources' conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect.
Avoid stretching into sharp pain; ease off if hypermobile.
- Sharp or radiating pain during stretching, stop and consult a clinician.
- Sudden loss of range of motion or joint instability, seek a physical therapist.
- Numbness, tingling, or a recent injury, get medical clearance first.
What the evidence says
The sources on this entry studied static stretching and joint range of motion, in single sessions and over training periods, across joints and muscle groups. Behm 2023 is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 studies and 1658 participants on acute stretching techniques and range of motion. Medeiros 2016 (meta-analysis) and Decoster 2005 (systematic review, 28 studies, 1338 participants) cover hamstring flexibility; Medeiros 2018 (systematic review and meta-analysis, 20 studies, 659 participants) and Radford 2006 (systematic review, 5 studies, 161 participants) cover ankle dorsiflexion; Konrad 2023 is a meta-analysis with meta-regression on chronic effects and their moderators; Thomas 2018 is a systematic review of stretching type, duration and range of motion. Three randomised trials compared stretch durations and intensities: Nakamura 2021, Fukaya 2020 and Kataura 2017. The sources' conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect of static stretching on range of motion, acute or chronic.
- This routine protects against injury.
- This routine cures back or joint pain.
- A single short session equals the full weekly evidence dose.
- Agreement
- Direction recorded for 0 of 10 sources; not yet recorded for the rest.
- The claim's outcome
- Outcome not yet recorded
- Certainty
- No source states a certainty rating.
- Authors
- Sources share authors: D. Medeiros (first author of 2 sources); A. Konrad (senior author of 2 sources).
What each source measured and concluded (10)
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- meta-analysis, systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 1658 participants across 47 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 1338 participants across 28 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review and meta-analysis
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 659 participants across 20 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 161 participants across 5 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
Every source below is shown with its study design and links to the original study. This is the audit trail.