Hamstring Flexibility Routine
Static holds, PNF or active variations for the hamstrings, 30 to 60 seconds a side, several days a week: one way to carry out what the sources on the concept entry studied, static stretching and range of motion, with hamstring flexibility among the targets. Their conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect.
Avoid bouncing into pain; ease off with sciatic-type symptoms.
- Sharp or radiating pain during stretching, stop and consult a clinician.
- Sudden loss of range of motion or joint instability, seek a physical therapist.
- Numbness, tingling, or a recent injury, get medical clearance first.
- Radiating leg pain or numbness, stop and consult a clinician.
How to do it
- Use static holds, PNF, or active variations 30–60 s per side, several days weekly.
What the evidence says
This practice is one way to carry out what the sources on the concept entry studied: static stretching and joint range of motion, with hamstring flexibility among the targets measured, by Decoster 2005 (systematic review, 28 studies, 1338 participants) and Medeiros 2016 (meta-analysis) among others. Those sources are seven syntheses and three randomised trials (Fukaya 2020, Nakamura 2021, Kataura 2017). Their conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect of this routine on hamstring flexibility. The full account, source by source, is on the concept entry on static stretching and range of motion this practice links to.
- Hamstring stretching protects against hamstring strains.
- It cures lower-back pain.
- One stretch equals the full weekly dose.
- Agreement
- Direction recorded for 0 of 10 sources; not yet recorded for the rest.
- The claim's outcome
- Outcome not yet recorded
- Certainty
- No source states a certainty rating.
- Authors
- Sources share authors: D. Medeiros (first author of 2 sources); A. Konrad (senior author of 2 sources).
What each source measured and concluded (10)
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- meta-analysis, systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 1658 participants across 47 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- Systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 1338 participants across 28 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review and meta-analysis
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 659 participants across 20 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 161 participants across 5 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
Every source below is shown with its study design and links to the original study. This is the audit trail.