Dynamic Stretching, Foam Rolling, PNF and Post-Activation Strategies: What the Comparisons Measured
Reviews and trials comparing dynamic stretching with foam rolling or self-myofascial release, PNF stretching and post-activation potentiation strategies before activity. The sources' conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect and no comparison.
Avoid rolling directly over bony areas, acute injuries, or areas with known vascular issues.
- Persistent joint pain or sudden loss of range of motion, refer to a physician or physical therapist.
What the evidence says
The sources on this entry compared dynamic stretching with, or alongside, foam rolling and self-myofascial release, PNF stretching and post-activation potentiation strategies before activity. Dutta 2023 is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 studies and 174 participants on foam rolling and dynamic stretching, with muscle strength and physical performance as the outcomes. Yu 2024 is a systematic review with meta-analysis of 19 studies on post-activation strategies and warm-up. Anderson 2020 (systematic review) addresses the same comparison. Five are randomised trials: López-Samanés 2021 (dynamic stretching and foam rolling in tennis), Deguzman 2018 (dynamic stretching, PNF and foam rolling), Malek 2024 (dynamic stretching and PNF for sprint and jump), and Somers 2020 and Seçer 2021 (self-myofascial release and dynamic stretching). The sources' conclusions are not yet recorded in this library, so this entry states no effect for any of these methods and ranks none of them.
- Foam rolling permanently reshapes fascia.
- Foam rolling removes cellulite or toxins.
- Agreement
- Direction recorded for 0 of 8 sources; not yet recorded for the rest.
- The claim's outcome
- Outcome not yet recorded
- Certainty
- No source states a certainty rating.
What each source measured and concluded (8)
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review with meta-analysis
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = not reported participants across 19 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- What the review says it includes
- systematic review and meta-analysis
- Studies and participants, as stated
- N = 174 participants across 8 studies
- How it was read
- read in full text
- How it was read
- read in full text
Every source below is shown with its study design and links to the original study. This is the audit trail.